Substance Painter Vs 3d Coat

Since substance painter allows users to paint in full 3d it can be used not only to paint full textures but can also paint masks which can then be used in other tools like substance designer for material filter generators like the ones used to make edge wear and dirt. However on one of the systems i use stuck with substance painter is terribly slow because of my ancient video card. Thats why a test of each program on your own hardware is better than somebodys opinion.
3d coat vs substance painter

If you are lacking a good uv mapper or retopology program both of 3d coats are very good.

Substance painter vs 3d coat. 3d coat is good but substance painter allows for more freedom for either realistic or stylized art styles. 3d coat seems to be more forgiving with various hardware. Been using the trial version of 3d coat for a while now and i like it would be great to actually be able to export ive heard good things about painter however. Substance painter is the industry standard for procedural texture painting and the layer system is very powerful like a 3d version of photoshop.

Substance painter or 3d coat. Substance painter is ranked 2nd while 3d coat is ranked 9th. The most important reason people chose substance painter is. I would say 3d coat is simpler but also more straightforward if you just want to paint on some geometry.

I recommend actually trying it and delving into all of its features before writing it off as a lesser tool. So far other than the 8k export cap substance painter has been better in my experience than 3d coat mari and quixel suite. Its that special time of year again and its time to drop some money on texturing software.